Diagnosing FIP
Diagnosing FIP
The diagnosis of FIP has a reputation for being challenging, but can often be fairly straight forward. With the advent of anti-viral treatment, there is now an additional diagnostic option, since a positive response to FIP anti-viral treatment is itself diagnostic.
Overview
The option of treatment also presents the challenge in shifting diagnostic patterns and goals to balance both time and financial resources between diagnostics and treatment. Initiating treatment quickly can be key to success, especially for wet FIP or FIP cats in critical condition.
FIP can be difficult to definitively diagnose, but it's not necessary, and rarely advantageous, to exhaust all diagnostic options, since response to treatment can itself be the confirming diagnostic for a presumptive diagnosis.
How Much Diagnostic Info Is Enough?
So how much diagnostic info is enough? It depends on the situation -- what pieces of information you have, how strongly the history, signalment, and diagnostics that you do have point to FIP, as well as the stability of the patient, and the financial constraints of the owner.
History and signalment are important guides here -- for example: A young male cat who was recently neutered and now presents as febrile and lethargic, with bloodwork showing A/G = 0.4 and lymphopenia.
In a case such as this, further diagnostics other than exams to check for presence of ocular or neurological involvement, as that would affect the treatment plan, should not be necessary to arrive at a presumptive diagnosis of FIP. If a mature adult cat were to present in this way, further workup such as ultrasound would not be unreasonable -- however a treatment trial would still be a valid option.
In cases where the diagnostic picture is more cloudy, a treatment trial may be preferable to invasive procedures like biopsy or exploratory surgery, both from the standpoint of impact on the patient, and financially for the owner.
Building a Diagnostic Wall

While it can be difficult or impossible to get definitive identification of FIP, in most cases a confident diagnosis can be made from a variety of evidence and diagnostics. Making a diagnosis relies on building a "diagnostic wall" of evidence as appropriate to the case.
The first place to start is to obtain the history and signalment of the cat, and consider the symptoms as presented upon exam and from description of the owner.
History and Signalment
Profiles of cats who developed FIP commonly show the following in their history:
Symptoms That Should Raise Suspicion for FIP
A basic eye and neurological exam, including evaluation of gait, wheelbarrow, positioning, placement, and related tests, may be important. Neurological and ocular symptoms can be present with any form of FIP, however they present more commonly with dry FIP than with wet FIP.
Bloodwork and Basic Diagnostic Tests
The next step is basic diagnostic tests. Obtaining a CBC and chemistry panel is useful for both diagnostic purposes and to serve as a baseline for treatment progress and is therefore recommended. Note though that not all cats will have strong indications of FIP in bloodwork, and that ocular and neurological FIP often compartmentalizes in the brain and eyes and can often present with unremarkable bloodwork.
The following bloodwork findings are of diagnostic significance, but are not definitive:
For example, while an A/G ratio of less than 0.6 is a classic diagnostic finding for FIP, FIP cats of all forms have been found to have higher ratios -- and conversely many conditions, including common ones like dental disease can cause an A/G ratio below 0.6.
Diagnostic Imaging
Diagnostic imaging can often be indicated to detect the presence of effusion, and/or organ or central lymph node involvement. Findings of diagnostic significance would include:
In cases where neurological FIP is suspected, MRI may be indicated to look for changes consistent with FIP.
Ascites Fluid and Effusion Testing
When ascites is present, there are several tests that are diagnostically significant. Importantly a FIP PCR test can be run on ascites fluid and some of these can provide definitive confirmation of FIP, although it cannot rule it out.
Ascites fluid from FIP typically appears:
The Rivalta test is a quick, inexpensive test which can can be run in-house with only distilled water and vinegar or acetic acid. Instructions can be found here. The Rivalta test does not detect the FIP virus, instead, it differentiates between a transudate from an exudate. This test has a 86% PPV and 97% NPV for FIP.
Fluid analysis/cytology findings include:
RT-PCR Tests and Advanced Sampling
RT-PCR Tests can detect specific mutations of FECV -- in some tests such as IDEXX they are able to specifically identify the biotype as FIP vs FECV.
RT-PCR has very good specificity and fair sensitivity for effusion but it is not useful for blood. Positive results are considered reliable, but there is approximately a 30% false negative rate meaning that a negative result cannot rule out FIP.
When there are inflamed lymph nodes or other lesions, a fine needle aspirate can be obtained and can also be tested via RT-PCR. Invasive biopsies and exploratory surgeries should generally be avoided unless absolutely necessary -- a treatment trial often is more appropriate in those cases.
RT-PCR tests can also be run on aqueous humor when there is ocular involvement and CSF samples.